SDS/HCI Terminology/Definition Debate

Yesterday was an interesting learning day for me due to a tweet I responded to from one of the WhatMatrix category consultants that sparked a Twitter debate about what really constitutes hyper converged infrastructure (HCI).

Herman Rutten, category consultant for SDS/HCI at WhatMatrix tweeted that he is working on a new Landscape Report on this sector, 18 months after the release of the first one. One of the latest vendors to be included in the comparison on WhatMatrix is Datrium. This inclusion invoked reaction from some vendor representatives that they are not HCI.

This blog is not going to deny or confirm if they are – there are better-informed people than I to have that debate with. But what I do want to state is that WhatMatrix’s comparison is entitled SDS/HCI – thus encompassing all aspects in my opinion.

WhatMatrix has been comparing the HCI vendors since October 2015 and has consistently included solutions that adhere to the following three criteria:

Rule #1: The software is designed to run on commodity server hardware and makes use of the available resources therein.

Rule #2: The solution aggregates physical storage capacity from separate systems into a single shared storage pool.

Rule #3: The solution offers a broad set of storage functionality (services) comparable to traditional hardware defined shared storage systems.

Now, whether you agree with that definition or not is the basis of the Twitter debate but ultimately all solutions are reviewed with this in mind, so at least providing a consistent approach.

I do think marketing (e.g. messaging) has confused and blurred the definition for sure, but as a summary to the whole discussion Herman tweeted the following and, yes, that is what it’s all about – choice for the customer!

The new report is scheduled for publication end of September, keep an eye out for it if you want an independent, vendor agnostic viewpoint of this burgeoning market https://www.whatmatrix.com/portal/announcing-upcoming-sds-hci-landscape-report-sep-2018/.

 

Politics, HCI and Social Media FUD

[update]

My Twitter and Facebook timelines have been swamped lately with conflicting posts. Conflicting because of differing – and confusing – opinions. Twitter has been full of the HPE/Nutanix #Dare2Compare ‘campaign’ and Facebook has been full of Labour/Conservative bollocks. Excuse the language but that’s really how I see it. I’m comparing the two because, to me, they represent the same thing – one side trying to get ‘one up or over’ the other by means of one-sided ‘facts’. The old saying “Lies, damned lies and statistics” has never been truer right now.

The one thing that I do know for sure is they all lie. Either deliberately or by twisting the truth. For the first time in my voting history I’ve no idea how to vote in tomorrow’s General Election – both main parties are led by liars and both their manifestos contain content that is so not relevant and a priority currently. On one side you have a pacifist and on the other you have a windsock debate ducker – neither of whom are showing great leadership skills in my opinion. Politically, I don’t think we’d be in this situation if the Referendum campaign had not been so full of lies – on both sides. And the people that led the charge – and won – then buggered off and left others to pick up their mess. So who knows what tomorrow will bring, but I’ve never felt more concerned for my country, and the world at large, than I do right now. I will vote tomorrow, too many people suffered to enable me to have this freedom, so I won’t shirk that responsibility, but where oh where to place that cross…………

Honestly, right now I’m sick of it, social media that is. I’m finding all the posts totally unprofessional and unnecessary. In the case of HPE/Nutanix, I’ve not been a fan of some Nutants’ posts and Twitter rants in the past, but I honestly didn’t expect HPE to stoop to the levels they have with their Dare2Compare campaign. Don’t they see all they’re doing is giving Nutanix airtime? I once fired a client because they wanted to go head-to-head against the market leader in a ‘trade-in’ campaign. I’ve never seen these work and just wouldn’t be party to it! Suffice it to say, they tried, failed and the sales leader that led that particular initiative got fired!

I’ve not always seen eye-to-eye with Josh Odgers on Twitter but can’t ignore his passion and enthusiasm to highlight the inaccuracies of the HPE claims, as this post demonstrates.

I would like to think that all involved in both these scenarios are doing and saying what they are because they truly believe they’re doing the right thing for their audience. But that isn’t the main reason in my view; Nutanix and HPE are doing what they’re doing because – yes I’m sure they believe what they’re individually saying -but because of shareholder value. May and Corbyn are doing what they’re doing to get their party into power which may not be the best thing for the people of this country.

On a lighter note, I’m registered for the London VMUG on 22nd June and hope to see many vPeeps there! Register here.